Comparison with Traditional Construction Methods
- Design-Bid-Build: The owner hires the architect first to develop scope, program, and design, then the project goes out to bid to General Contractors. This separation can lead to siloed communication and costly change orders.
- Construction Management at Risk (CMAR): A construction manager oversees the project, but design and construction are still separate phases.
- Integrated Project Delivery (IPD): A collaborative approach involving shared risk and reward among all parties but can be complex to implement.
The Design-Build Process
Step-by-Step Guide:
- Project Initiation: Define project goals, initial consultation, and create a detailed project brief.
- Site Selection: Identify, analyze, evaluate, and secure the optimal site.
- Project Conception/Feasibility: Conduct feasibility studies, develop a preliminary budget, assess risks, and seek client approval.
- Team Selection: Issue RFQs, RFPs, evaluate proposals, and select the design-build team.
- Project Planning/Preconstruction: Hold kickoff meetings, develop detailed plans, and create a risk management plan.
- Design: Create schematic designs, develop detailed designs, update cost estimates, and prepare construction documents.
- Construction: Mobilize the site, procure materials, execute construction, implement quality control, and conduct regular inspections.
- Completion: Perform final inspections, create and address a punch list, conduct a client walkthrough, provide as-built documentation, and formally hand over the project.

Role of the Design-Build Team
The design-build team includes the building owner, general contractor/construction manager, architect, engineers, subcontractors, and suppliers working as a fully integrated team.
Challenges and Solutions in Design-Build
- Scope Creep: Mitigation through detailed initial planning and continuous stakeholder engagement.
- Communication and Coordination: Implementing integrated project management tools and regular coordination meetings.
- Design Quality Control: Establishing rigorous design review processes and early involvement of construction professionals.
- Risk Allocation: Clearly defined contracts that outline risk responsibilities.
- Budget Management: Continuous cost monitoring and flexible budgeting.
- Regulatory Compliance: Early and ongoing involvement of regulatory bodies.
- Quality Assurance: Stringent QA/QC processes.
- Subcontractor Management: Careful selection of subcontractors and clear communication.
- Client Involvement: Establishing clear roles and responsibilities for client interaction.
- Technology Integration: Adopting compatible and integrated software solutions.
- Schedule Management: Detailed scheduling with built-in flexibility.
- Contractual and Legal Issues: Engaging experienced legal counsel.
- Stakeholder Management: Regular stakeholder meetings and transparent communication.
- Sustainability and Environmental Concerns: Early integration of sustainability goals.
Design-Build vs. Traditional Construction Methods
- Design-Bid-Build: Unforeseen issues can derail schedules and budgets, whereas design-build’s collaboration uncovers these issues during the design phase.
- Construction Management at Risk: Provides some integration but lacks the single point of responsibility found in design-build.
When to Choose Design-Build Over Other Methods
Design-build is best for larger, more complex projects, offering predictable costs, faster construction, teamwork, total accountability, and fewer change orders. It’s particularly effective for manufacturing projects and projects with well-defined scopes.
Key Players in the Design-Build Process
- Owner: Creates vision and goals, selects the design-builder, and manages one contract.
- Design-Build General Contractor: Includes project executives, managers, engineers, and superintendents.
- Architects and Engineers: Develop designs and provide technical expertise.
- Subcontractors and Subconsultants: Provide specialized services and expertise.
Summit Design+Build Case Studies:
Method Project
Method’s 157,660 SF manufacturing facility in Chicago’s historic Pullman neighborhood utilized the design-build approach to integrate sustainable features such as a refurbished 230-foot wind turbine and a rooftop greenhouse. The collaborative team managed significant scope changes efficiently, maintaining the project’s schedule and LEED® Platinum status.
“Summit completed the project on time, on budget, and on strategy.”
– Jordan Martin, Method
EJ Basler
The renovation of an existing industrial warehouse involved selective demolition and the new construction of an addition. Effective communication, thorough pre-construction planning, and integrated project delivery were key success factors.
“Our newly constructed production machining facility is amazing; all of our employees are excited to come to work in the new space.”
– Dennis Basler, President, EJ Basler
Selecting the Right Design-Build Contractor
Questions to Ask Potential Firms
- What is your experience with similar projects?
- How do you manage project scope and changes?
- Can you provide references from previous clients?
Red Flags to Watch Out For
- Lack of experience with similar projects
- Poor communication or transparency
- Unclear project management processes
Future of Design-Build Construction
The future of design-build construction looks promising, with increasing adoption across various sectors. Advances in technology, such as Building Information Modeling (BIM), are enhancing the design-build process, making it more efficient and collaborative. Additionally, new infrastructure legislation is likely to increase the use of design-build for public projects.
Quotes from Summit Design + Build Professionals:
Alekhya Pujari, Project Manager: “The design-build method gives us a deeper understanding of your needs and expectations. When we are involved in the design process, we are always thinking about value engineering to meet the budget and schedule proactively. The process is seamless, and the results typically exceed expectations. Not to mention, you know we got it all covered this way!“
Prajit Hari, Project Engineer II: “The design-build approach meant we were involved in the project from the very beginning, back when it was just an ‘idea’. This helped us understand the client’s expectations a lot better and put us in a better spot to manage and ultimately deliver them. It’s a lot more involved than the traditional ‘design first-build later’ approach but at the same time, a lot more rewarding.“
Glenn Miles, Vice President of Project Management: “This integrated approach not only accelerates timelines and optimizes costs but also enhances the quality and innovation of our projects.“
Tony Denofrio, Vice President of Field Operations: “Design-build, as used by Summit, offers a streamlined and collaborative approach that combines design and construction into a single phase, promoting efficiency, cost savings, and improved project outcomes.“
Amber Autumn, Director of Business Development: “Design-build is not just a method; it’s a mindset. It’s about working together from the outset to align our goals, streamline our processes, and deliver exceptional results.“
Design-build is not just a method; it’s a mindset. It’s about working together from the outset to align our goals, streamline our processes, and deliver exceptional results.
– Amber Autumn